I am developing, as a personal project, an ontology for classifying statistical results of ecological studies.
Ontologies are developed in the computing and biomedial domains, but the subject in still young in the ecology field.
My project aims to provide a toolkit, for ecologists, for classifying their results (field and lab data, statistical analyses).
This new ontology will be tailored to the needs of the field of ecology and will rely heavily on existing ontologies, some developed for other domains.
https://github.com/noetsa/Mouses
Goals
- Provide a toolkit for classifying ecology results and studies
- Facilitate comparison between studies
- Facilitate queries on existing studies
- Make meta-studies easier
- Facilitate input preparation for future Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence studies.
Properties
This new ontology should have these desirable properties (non-exhaustive list):
- Relies mostly on imported concepts from existing, established ontologies.
- Interoperates well with these existing ontologies.
- Eliminates or minimizes redundancy of concepts imported from other ontologies.
- Uses BFO, the Basic Formal Ontology, for consistency with many existing scientific ontologies.
- Includes most common concepts used in ecology and in ecological studies and results.
- Statistical methods are hierarchically organized and have properties. This enables comparison between statistical methods.
- When possible relations between statistical methods/results are defined. For example, can we define the “total variance” of two statistical results?
- Environments, species are also imported or accessible from the ontology.
- Ideally, when the ontology is complete and a good number of ecological studies are defined using the ontology, queries such as the following could be answered by a reasoner: “mean population of diptera in arid climate, years between 1990 and 2005, with number and name of studies, and combined error measure”
Some of these goals may be mutually exclusive so sometimes it will be a matter of balance. If a community develops around this project, feedback will be very valuable to achieve balance between competing desirable properties.
Imported ontologies
STATO (currently in full) https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/STATO
MAMO (excluding domain specific classes) https://sourceforge.net/projects/mamo-ontology/
OBOE (currently in full) https://github.com/NCEAS/oboe/
Considered ontologies for future import, compliance or interaction
BFO https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO
NCBITaxon http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/ncbitaxon.html
Other ontologies to consider: Ontologies about GIS, containing concepts such as point, coordinates, area, area shape, area size, fragmentation, width, neighboring, distance, etc.
Ontologies of interest, not imported at the moment
ENVO https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/ENVO
BCO https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/BCO
PCO https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PCO
Agronomy Ontology https://github.com/AgriculturalSemantics/agro
ecocore https://github.com/EcologicalSemantics/ecocore
SWEET https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet
Other ontologies
OBCS https://github.com/obcs/obcs
EDAM http://edamontology.org/page
GEOSPECIES https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/GEOSPECIES
Plan
Version 0.1:
-Organize imported concepts of STATO, MAMO and OBOE ontologies within the new ontology, while considering compatibility with BFO ontology.
-Work out licencing and citation mechanisms for both imported and new ontology
-Publish version 0.1 of MOUSE ontology on GitHub
Version 0.2:
-Import needed concepts of ENVO, BCO, PCO, Agronomy Ontology, ecocore, SWEET ontologies, and GIS concepts ontology.
Version 0.3:
-Import/interface with NCBITaxon ontology, or the NCBI Taxon database.
Version 0.4:
-Create missing concepts for our domain. Test basic queries.
Version 0.5:
-Work on the relationships between statistical results.
If you have insights on the subject, know of relevant or similar ontologies, work on a similar project, or wish to share ideas, please contact me 🙂